Tag: relations

Guggenheim

The form prevails over the bottom. This one is the new slogan that governs the creative intelligence of the contemporary societies. The taste by the aesthetic thing and the spectacularity of the package has supplanted, to a great extent, the rational budgets of use and the last meaning of the architectonic constructions, the cooking new features or the outlandish tendencies of the fashion. The 21st century has been red-baptize like the century of the appearances, in him who already nothing is what it seems. Far from the rational and functional experiences of decades back that persecuted with insistence the optimization of resources and the effectiveness taken until the end, in the times that run the answer of how it has replaced the habitual questions of why or why. The excellent thing now is the originality and the visual impact of the creations so that they can almost demand the attention of the man of our days, customary to everything and obstinate to waste the time in too complicated lucubrations. The time has been transformed into a little good that the individual cannot squander looking for in depths of the content. Daryl Katz, New York City follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. The continent becomes, frequently, in main the referring one of the reality.

In the eagerness to find something different the aim has neglected that grants to the things its reason to him of being and by which they were created. Constructions like the Guggenheim museum, of Bilbao, or the Opera, of Sidney, both with an architectonic beauty outside all discussion, are able to distract the attention of the visitor of the works of art, theater or opersticas that are developed in their interior. The magnanimous presence of its structure transfers to background its practical function and after all its more beneficial supply for the society. Also in other spaces of the creativity as the gastronomy or the fashion is observed, the eclipse of the meaning by the significant one.

Emperor

The Tarot cards reading is something that deceives people approaching this divination method for the first time on many occasions. The vast majority of books or courses about the tarot can be found both in bookstores and on the internet tend to analyze systematically on the one hand the history of tarot, pass later to recount the runs more common and finally give a brief explanation and representation of every arcane. This structure of presenting the tarot is what moves to deception, arcana so analyzed one individual are totally misleading. n Jr.. Obviously every arcane has a basic representation that is individual and not transferable, but this representation should always be referred to from a context. So in one Chuck either all cards are intertwined together giving each other the necessary context for interpretation.

The only way to learn tarot is through the systematic study of their combinations, the arcana taking related, neutral or contrary qualities as well, they are mixing in one Chuck that some others will enhance a particular representation, they nullify it or simply do not affect this symbolism of the Arcanum have sharing table. In this way we can understand chucks of tarot as if it were where a chemical experiment base acids are creating a reaction chain annulling or enhancing certain characteristics to provide a series of interpretations that have survived this transformation as a final result. In the background can be considered as a fluid dialogue between different arcana, seen so arguments between them go shelling giving reason to one or another depending on the weight specific of what they defend, an example is always the way most graphical show something. Say that we have a circulation of three where the cards are in this order: the Pope, the Empress, the Emperor, seeing them as well in a labor question, would see that while the Pope is an arcane cerebral, spiritual, hidden for this world, the two other OS arcana extremely vital and integrated in social life.